In the concluding paragraph of an excellent piece in
Counterpunch titled, “Reaper Madness: Obama’s Whack-A-Mole Killing Machine,”
Doug Noble writes,
“What I’ve tried to show here is
something more: that these military miscreants have also known all
along that their drone technology and targeting strategy are militarily
bankrupt. They could not but be aware from military history and doctrine
that these approaches have absolutely no possibility of defeating
terrorist groups or keeping America safe. They must know that in fact the
opposite is true, that their nefarious enterprise only further endangers
us all. And yet they will continue ever more brazenly their Reaper madness, the
scholars here all agree, until we find some way to stop them.”
This begs the question: Why, if the military knows drone
strikes are counterproductive, de we keep using drones? I believe there’s only
one plausible answer. America must have an enemy. In order to sustain our
bloated, massively expensive military/industrial/media complex, we must have an
evil “other” to do battle with, to justify the obscene amounts of taxpayer
dollars being sucked into the black hole of “national security.”
The end of the Cold War and the communist empire ushered in
a vacuum that was quickly filled with a new enemy, international terrorism. The
1990s saw the rise of the Taliban and Al Qaeda, organizations the U.S. helped
create and arm, but it wasn’t until the new Pearl Harbor of 9/11 that the war
on terror shifted into high gear.
From the American perspective, the wars in Afghanistan and
Iraq were just what the military ordered, but after well over a decade of
fighting, it became obvious to even the most hawkish cheerleaders (except Dick
Cheney) that the wars were a debacle that did far more harm than good. But we
couldn’t just pick up our marbles and go home without somehow continuing the
war on terrorists and unfriendly regimes in the region, so we sent in the
drones.
Although many experts outside of Washington D.C. agree that
the use of drones is ineffective and even counterproductive, Obama is enlarging
the program, which for me, means that by the government’s reasoning, that’s
exactly the point. Killing civilians means keeping the populace stirred up and
angry at America which means more terrorists that we need to fight and the
cycle continues ad nauseam. As horrible as it sounds, what other explanation
can there be?
The war on terror is a self-perpetuating farce
designed to focus Americans away from the issues we face at home and keep the
military/industrial/media complex fat and well-funded.
No comments:
Post a Comment