There’s an important article today at the Electronic Frontier Foundation that examines the five main arguments made in defense of
the NSA mass surveillance by the President and others, with a detailed
debunking of each one. What the article makes obvious is that there really is
no good argument to justify this type of untargeted mass spying. It exists and
it is continuing to be used, but no one has a credible legal justification for
the gathering of private communications where no suspicion of wrongdoing exists.
Not Obama, not Feinstein, not Clapper. It is illegal and unconstitutional.
Period.
No comments:
Post a Comment